Difference between revisions of "Teleconference 2022-03-23"

From VTKM
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Attendees: == ECP Updates == * ECP funds approved for travel ** Still have to follow your local institutions rules ** Pre-COVID rules still apply *** 3-5% of overall budget...")
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
*** Foreign travel requires ECP pre-approval (+ other DOE approvals)
 
*** Foreign travel requires ECP pre-approval (+ other DOE approvals)
 
* ECP Annual Meeting
 
* ECP Annual Meeting
 +
** If you want to attend NDA sessions on Aurora, you need an account on Articus
 +
*** Get an account now before it is too late
 
** Poster discussion (due April 18)
 
** Poster discussion (due April 18)
 
* ECP management is wanting bi-weekly updates on early access progress
 
* ECP management is wanting bi-weekly updates on early access progress

Revision as of 15:57, 22 March 2022

Attendees:

ECP Updates

  • ECP funds approved for travel
    • Still have to follow your local institutions rules
    • Pre-COVID rules still apply
      • 3-5% of overall budget
      • Foreign travel requires ECP pre-approval (+ other DOE approvals)
  • ECP Annual Meeting
    • If you want to attend NDA sessions on Aurora, you need an account on Articus
      • Get an account now before it is too late
    • Poster discussion (due April 18)
  • ECP management is wanting bi-weekly updates on early access progress
  • Software sustainability town halls
  • Let's think about possible highlights
    • App engagement
    • Success with porting (e.g. run on Aurora)
    • Engagement with other ST teams (e.g. using Kokkos)
    • WDM
    • Possible highlight slide on particle advection with WarpX (Matt)
    • Some work with MFIX. Going to execute on Summit. Might wait for run on early access machine before highlight.

Porting Activities

ECP task updates

ECP/VTK-m Project Management

Roundtable

LSSw whitepaper: a big part of Jim's response is a question of whether everything should be in VTK-m or if there is still stuff that should be otherwise. We should give some thought on what should or shouldn't be in VTK-m and have a reasonable argument for it.

R&D100?

  • Thinking of submitting for 2022
  • Big stumbling block: needs to be "created" between Jan 2021 to March 2022
  • Plan: Release VTK-m 2.0, do a copyright assertion

Rename master branch?

  • Need to wait for some changes to git before the transition (for some automated features of repo).
  • Can we for a time have a master that mirrors the new default?
    • Don't know, but seems possible. Will have to look into that.