Difference between revisions of "Teleconference 2021-02-17"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Attendees: == ECP Updates == * Let's think about possible highlights ** App engagement ** Success with porting (e.g. run on Aurora) ** Engagement with other ST teams (e.g. u...") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Attendees: | + | Attendees: Nick Davis (SNL), Ken Moreland (SNL), Matt Larsen (LLNL), Berk Geveci (Kitware), Catlin Ross (Kitware), Silvio Rizzi (ANL), Sujin Philip (Kitware), Ollie Lo (LANL), Vicente Bolea (Kitware) |
== ECP Updates == | == ECP Updates == | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Roundtable == | == Roundtable == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Wiki might go down real soon. Might need to capture. | ||
We need some redesign design workflow for branchy release process | We need some redesign design workflow for branchy release process | ||
Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
* _Bug fixes_ happen off the release branch | * _Bug fixes_ happen off the release branch | ||
** Get merged to both the release branch and the master branch | ** Get merged to both the release branch and the master branch | ||
+ | * This in principal should already be supported by GitLab | ||
+ | ** Just create a merge request on a different branch | ||
+ | ** Will need to add support to gitlab-push | ||
+ | *** Ask VTK folks. They might just have a select few to do a special process. | ||
+ | ** Need to check that bot stuff works (CI builds, Do: merge, etc.) | ||
Should think about releasing VTK-m 1.6, 2.0. | Should think about releasing VTK-m 1.6, 2.0. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Filter redesign requirements: https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk-m/-/issues/601 | ||
Matt working on WarpX highlight. | Matt working on WarpX highlight. |
Latest revision as of 13:58, 17 February 2021
Attendees: Nick Davis (SNL), Ken Moreland (SNL), Matt Larsen (LLNL), Berk Geveci (Kitware), Catlin Ross (Kitware), Silvio Rizzi (ANL), Sujin Philip (Kitware), Ollie Lo (LANL), Vicente Bolea (Kitware)
ECP Updates
- Let's think about possible highlights
- App engagement
- Success with porting (e.g. run on Aurora)
- Engagement with other ST teams (e.g. using Kokkos)
- WDM
- Submitted highlight on integration with EFFIS
- Expect to submit another highlight when used in a big run
- Possible highlight slide on particle advection with WarpX (Matt).
Porting Activities
- https://confluence.exascaleproject.org/display/STDA05/Porting+Activities+A21
- https://confluence.exascaleproject.org/display/STDA05/Porting+Activities+O21
ECP task updates
Roundtable
Wiki might go down real soon. Might need to capture.
We need some redesign design workflow for branchy release process
- When we create a VTK-m release, we have a branch for that release (at least until the subsequent release).
- New feature development continues on the main branch
- _Bug fixes_ happen off the release branch
- Get merged to both the release branch and the master branch
- This in principal should already be supported by GitLab
- Just create a merge request on a different branch
- Will need to add support to gitlab-push
- Ask VTK folks. They might just have a select few to do a special process.
- Need to check that bot stuff works (CI builds, Do: merge, etc.)
Should think about releasing VTK-m 1.6, 2.0.
Filter redesign requirements: https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk-m/-/issues/601
Matt working on WarpX highlight.
Rename master branch?
- Need to wait for some changes to git before the transition (for some automated features of repo).
- Can we for a time have a master that mirrors the new default?
- Don't know, but seems possible. Will have to look into that.