Difference between revisions of "Teleconference 2018-07-11"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Attendees: | + | Attendees: Ken Moreland (SNL), Abhishek Yenpure (UO/SNL), Dave Pugmire (ORNL), Matt Letter (SNL), Robert Maynard (Kitware), Allie Vacanti (Kitware), Berk Geveci (Kitware), Haochang Liu (Kitware), Hank Childs (UO), Ollie Lo (LANL) |
Policy for granting developer access | Policy for granting developer access | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
** Should be some vetting process, right? | ** Should be some vetting process, right? | ||
** Maybe say you can be a developer after some prescribed number of assisted merges (2? 3?) | ** Maybe say you can be a developer after some prescribed number of assisted merges (2? 3?) | ||
| + | ** Hank: we should be as inclusive as possible. | ||
| + | * We should reach back to anyone who sends such a request | ||
| + | ** Rob: Is there a way to get their email? | ||
| + | ** Could open issue and use notifications on tracker | ||
Apologies for somewhat unstable merges at the end of June. | Apologies for somewhat unstable merges at the end of June. | ||
* ECP milestone deadlines pushed us to accept some merges that we would normally have waited on. | * ECP milestone deadlines pushed us to accept some merges that we would normally have waited on. | ||
| − | * We | + | * We are still working through some issues of recursive function calls on CUDA |
* With that, let's be more vigilant about ECP deadlines. | * With that, let's be more vigilant about ECP deadlines. | ||
Upcoming ECP Milestones | Upcoming ECP Milestones | ||
* Better Dynamic Types | * Better Dynamic Types | ||
| + | ** Doesn't look like it will completely done by end of September | ||
* Rendering Topological Entities | * Rendering Topological Entities | ||
* OpenMP | * OpenMP | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dave: Mark Kim is making good progress on finishing up the rendering entities. Pushing to one of Matt Larsen's branches. Need to work merging that back to master. | ||
Ken: working on not requiring a device adapter tag for using a Dispatcher. Will use TryExecute under the covers to find a valid one. Mostly this cleans up the code quite a bit. It increases the use of vtkm::cont::Algorithm quite a bit. Added a way to pass vtkm::cont::ExecutionObjectBase classes to arguments that automatically get converted to the device the algorithm is actually run on. | Ken: working on not requiring a device adapter tag for using a Dispatcher. Will use TryExecute under the covers to find a valid one. Mostly this cleans up the code quite a bit. It increases the use of vtkm::cont::Algorithm quite a bit. Added a way to pass vtkm::cont::ExecutionObjectBase classes to arguments that automatically get converted to the device the algorithm is actually run on. | ||
There are a few instances where a worklet is tied to a specific device because it is holding some device specific structures (usually array portals). Usually this is easily fixed by passing arrays to Invoke with WholeArray* arguments. Sometimes you have to build ExecObject arguments, which is a little more complicated because you have to create dual control/execution objects. The biggest change so far is with particle advection integrators and evaluators, which I am working on right now. | There are a few instances where a worklet is tied to a specific device because it is holding some device specific structures (usually array portals). Usually this is easily fixed by passing arrays to Invoke with WholeArray* arguments. Sometimes you have to build ExecObject arguments, which is a little more complicated because you have to create dual control/execution objects. The biggest change so far is with particle advection integrators and evaluators, which I am working on right now. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Rob suggested adding an ExecutionSignature tag that passes the device adapter tag to the worklet operator. That way you could make compiler specializations for a particular device. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Matt Letter: working on getting the user's guide to compile. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Matt Letter: in review of atomic array merge request. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Abhishek: working on point merge feature. Find all points that are coincident or within a certain threshold and merge them together. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Rob: can pass pointers to Invoke. They get automatically converted to references to be passed to transport. Also fixed an issue where all transports assumed a const object, which precluded doing something like a PrepareForOutput. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Rob: fix a bug with the color table where you could not specify to which device it would go to. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Allie: fixed some issues with dashboards. CUDA 32-bit ids are working again. New worklet that is generating wavelets. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Haochang: adding warp by vector and warp by scalar. Also working with bug diy with CUDA and VTK. | ||
Revision as of 12:43, 11 July 2018
Attendees: Ken Moreland (SNL), Abhishek Yenpure (UO/SNL), Dave Pugmire (ORNL), Matt Letter (SNL), Robert Maynard (Kitware), Allie Vacanti (Kitware), Berk Geveci (Kitware), Haochang Liu (Kitware), Hank Childs (UO), Ollie Lo (LANL)
Policy for granting developer access
- What is a non member able to do?
- Can they submit an MR request (but not merge it)?
- That sounds fine for introductory behavior
- Is the difference that Developers can merge their own MR?
- Should be some vetting process, right?
- Maybe say you can be a developer after some prescribed number of assisted merges (2? 3?)
- Hank: we should be as inclusive as possible.
- We should reach back to anyone who sends such a request
- Rob: Is there a way to get their email?
- Could open issue and use notifications on tracker
Apologies for somewhat unstable merges at the end of June.
- ECP milestone deadlines pushed us to accept some merges that we would normally have waited on.
- We are still working through some issues of recursive function calls on CUDA
- With that, let's be more vigilant about ECP deadlines.
Upcoming ECP Milestones
- Better Dynamic Types
- Doesn't look like it will completely done by end of September
- Rendering Topological Entities
- OpenMP
Dave: Mark Kim is making good progress on finishing up the rendering entities. Pushing to one of Matt Larsen's branches. Need to work merging that back to master.
Ken: working on not requiring a device adapter tag for using a Dispatcher. Will use TryExecute under the covers to find a valid one. Mostly this cleans up the code quite a bit. It increases the use of vtkm::cont::Algorithm quite a bit. Added a way to pass vtkm::cont::ExecutionObjectBase classes to arguments that automatically get converted to the device the algorithm is actually run on.
There are a few instances where a worklet is tied to a specific device because it is holding some device specific structures (usually array portals). Usually this is easily fixed by passing arrays to Invoke with WholeArray* arguments. Sometimes you have to build ExecObject arguments, which is a little more complicated because you have to create dual control/execution objects. The biggest change so far is with particle advection integrators and evaluators, which I am working on right now.
Rob suggested adding an ExecutionSignature tag that passes the device adapter tag to the worklet operator. That way you could make compiler specializations for a particular device.
Matt Letter: working on getting the user's guide to compile.
Matt Letter: in review of atomic array merge request.
Abhishek: working on point merge feature. Find all points that are coincident or within a certain threshold and merge them together.
Rob: can pass pointers to Invoke. They get automatically converted to references to be passed to transport. Also fixed an issue where all transports assumed a const object, which precluded doing something like a PrepareForOutput.
Rob: fix a bug with the color table where you could not specify to which device it would go to.
Allie: fixed some issues with dashboards. CUDA 32-bit ids are working again. New worklet that is generating wavelets.
Haochang: adding warp by vector and warp by scalar. Also working with bug diy with CUDA and VTK.
