Difference between revisions of "Teleconference 2022-04-06"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Attendees: == ECP Updates == * ECP Annual Meeting ** If you want to attend NDA sessions on Aurora, you need an account on Articus *** Get an account now before it is too la...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Attendees: | + | Attendees: Ken Moreland (ORNL), Terry Turton (LANL), Abishek Yenpure (UO), Mark Bolstad (SNL), Nicole Marsaglia (UO), Tushar Athawale (ORNL), Hank Childs (UO), Manish Mathi (UO), Eric Brugger (LLNL), Silvio Rizzi (ANL), Sujin Philip (Kitware), Berk Geveci (Kitware), Vicente Bolea (Kitware) |
== ECP Updates == | == ECP Updates == | ||
Revision as of 11:45, 6 April 2022
Attendees: Ken Moreland (ORNL), Terry Turton (LANL), Abishek Yenpure (UO), Mark Bolstad (SNL), Nicole Marsaglia (UO), Tushar Athawale (ORNL), Hank Childs (UO), Manish Mathi (UO), Eric Brugger (LLNL), Silvio Rizzi (ANL), Sujin Philip (Kitware), Berk Geveci (Kitware), Vicente Bolea (Kitware)
ECP Updates
- ECP Annual Meeting
- If you want to attend NDA sessions on Aurora, you need an account on Articus
- Get an account now before it is too late
- Poster discussion (due April 18)
- If you want to attend NDA sessions on Aurora, you need an account on Articus
- ECP FY23 planning
- Consider if you have the funding for our scope. Raise concerns early
- Start thinking about your FY23 P6 Activities
- What compute resources will we need to verify our KPP-3 scores?
- What will be done if applications don't come through themselves?
- Software sustainability town halls
- Let's think about possible highlights
- App engagement
- Success with porting (e.g. run on Aurora)
- Engagement with other ST teams (e.g. using Kokkos)
- WDM
- Possible highlight slide on particle advection with WarpX (Matt)
- Some work with MFIX. Going to execute on Summit. Might wait for run on early access machine before highlight.
Porting Activities
- https://wiki.jlse.anl.gov/display/inteldga/ECP+2.3.4.13+VTK-m
- https://confluence.exascaleproject.org/display/STDA05/Porting+Activities+O21
ECP task updates
Roundtable
LSSw whitepaper: a big part of Jim's response is a question of whether everything should be in VTK-m or if there is still stuff that should be otherwise. We should give some thought on what should or shouldn't be in VTK-m and have a reasonable argument for it.
R&D100?
- Thinking of submitting for 2022
- Big stumbling block: needs to be "created" between Jan 2021 to March 2022
- Plan: Release VTK-m 2.0, do a copyright assertion
Rename master branch?
- Need to wait for some changes to git before the transition (for some automated features of repo).
- Can we for a time have a master that mirrors the new default?
- Don't know, but seems possible. Will have to look into that.
