Teleconference 2022-01-26

Attendees:

ECP Updates

• ECP Annual Meeting
  • Call for BoF, Breakout, Panel, Tutorials: Due Feb 16
  • Usually participate with Alpine
• Crusher test and development system for Frontier
  • Our CSC331 project now has access
    • Apparently Kitware does not have access (even though I was told they would have it)
  • If you are waiting on my approval for something, send me an email
    • System is still not alerting me when I have approvals waiting
• ECP management is wanting weekly updates on early access progress
  • Not sure how that communication is going to happen
• Software sustainability town halls
  • https://lssw.io/
• Let's think about possible highlights
  • App engagement
  • Success with porting (e.g. run on Aurora)
  • Engagement with other ST teams (e.g. using Kokkos)
  • WDM
    • Submitted highlight on integration with EFFIS
    • Expect to submit another highlight when used in a big run
  • Possible highlight slide on particle advection with WarpX (Matt)
  • Improvement with Kokkos on Spock

Porting Activities

• https://wiki.jlse.anl.gov/display/inteldga/ECP+2.3.4.13+VTK-m
• https://frontier-coe.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/FCOE/pages/1161625609/Porting+Activities+O21

ECP task updates

ECP/VTK-m Project Management

Roundtable

When updating the tests, Ken noticed some discrepancies in the rendering for some types of components. Who is now responsible for rendering and can take a look at this:

• MapperQuad colors are wrong
• MapperConnectivity is buggy
• MapperCylinder just does not work

LSSw whitepaper: a big part of Jim's response is a question of whether everything should be in VTK-m or if there is still stuff that should be otherwise. We should give some thought on what should or shouldn't be in VTK-m and have a reasonable argument for it.

R&D100?

• Thinking of submitting for 2022
• Big stumbling block: needs to be "created" between Jan 2021 to March 2022
• Plan: Release VTK-m 2.0, do a copyright assertion

Rename master branch?

• Need to wait for some changes to git before the transition (for some automated features of repo).
• Can we for a time have a master that mirrors the new default?
  • Don't know, but seems possible. Will have to look into that.