Teleconference 2022-02-16

From VTKM
Revision as of 14:33, 11 February 2022 by Kmorel (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Attendees: == ECP Updates == * Ken will be gone the next 2 weeks ** No meetings during that time * ECP Annual Meeting ** Officially now virtual, week of May 2 ** Call for B...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Attendees:

ECP Updates

  • Ken will be gone the next 2 weeks
    • No meetings during that time
  • ECP Annual Meeting
    • Officially now virtual, week of May 2
    • Call for BoF, Breakout, Panel, Tutorials: Due Feb 23
    • Participating in tutorial with Alpine
    • Participating in DAV BOF during Community BOF days
  • Crusher test and development system for Frontier
    • Kitware now has access
  • ECP management is wanting bi-weekly updates on early access progress
    • Will be biweekly updates on confluence
    • No NDA (limited communication for Arcticus)
    • Plan to summarize progress discussed in this meeting
  • Software sustainability town halls
  • Let's think about possible highlights
    • App engagement
    • Success with porting (e.g. run on Aurora)
    • Engagement with other ST teams (e.g. using Kokkos)
    • WDM
    • Possible highlight slide on particle advection with WarpX (Matt)
    • Some work with MFIX. Going to execute on Summit. Might wait for run on early access machine before highlight.

Porting Activities

ECP task updates

ECP/VTK-m Project Management

Roundtable

What do we do with the tutorial slides. Sounds like consensus is to go ahead and put it in the repo as an LFS file.

LSSw whitepaper: a big part of Jim's response is a question of whether everything should be in VTK-m or if there is still stuff that should be otherwise. We should give some thought on what should or shouldn't be in VTK-m and have a reasonable argument for it.

R&D100?

  • Thinking of submitting for 2022
  • Big stumbling block: needs to be "created" between Jan 2021 to March 2022
  • Plan: Release VTK-m 2.0, do a copyright assertion

Rename master branch?

  • Need to wait for some changes to git before the transition (for some automated features of repo).
  • Can we for a time have a master that mirrors the new default?
    • Don't know, but seems possible. Will have to look into that.