Difference between revisions of "Teleconference 2022-03-16"

From VTKM
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Attendees: == ECP Updates == * ECP Annual Meeting ** Poster discussion (due April 18) * ECP management is wanting bi-weekly updates on early access progress ** Will be biwe...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Attendees:  
+
Attendees: Ken Moreland (ORNL), Mark Bolstad (SNL), Dave Pugmire (ORNL), Silvio Rizzi (ANL), Abhishek Yenpure (UO), Roxana Bujak (LANL), Sujin Philip (Kitware), Tushar Athawale (ORNL), Hank Childs (UO), James Kress (ORNL), Berk Geveci (Kitware), Vicente Bolea (Kitware)
  
 
== ECP Updates ==
 
== ECP Updates ==

Latest revision as of 12:47, 16 March 2022

Attendees: Ken Moreland (ORNL), Mark Bolstad (SNL), Dave Pugmire (ORNL), Silvio Rizzi (ANL), Abhishek Yenpure (UO), Roxana Bujak (LANL), Sujin Philip (Kitware), Tushar Athawale (ORNL), Hank Childs (UO), James Kress (ORNL), Berk Geveci (Kitware), Vicente Bolea (Kitware)

ECP Updates

  • ECP Annual Meeting
    • Poster discussion (due April 18)
  • ECP management is wanting bi-weekly updates on early access progress
  • Software sustainability town halls
  • Let's think about possible highlights
    • App engagement
    • Success with porting (e.g. run on Aurora)
    • Engagement with other ST teams (e.g. using Kokkos)
    • WDM
    • Possible highlight slide on particle advection with WarpX (Matt)
    • Some work with MFIX. Going to execute on Summit. Might wait for run on early access machine before highlight.

Porting Activities

ECP task updates

ECP/VTK-m Project Management

Roundtable

LSSw whitepaper: a big part of Jim's response is a question of whether everything should be in VTK-m or if there is still stuff that should be otherwise. We should give some thought on what should or shouldn't be in VTK-m and have a reasonable argument for it.

R&D100?

  • Thinking of submitting for 2022
  • Big stumbling block: needs to be "created" between Jan 2021 to March 2022
  • Plan: Release VTK-m 2.0, do a copyright assertion

Rename master branch?

  • Need to wait for some changes to git before the transition (for some automated features of repo).
  • Can we for a time have a master that mirrors the new default?
    • Don't know, but seems possible. Will have to look into that.